THE IMPORTANCE OF FRENCH TRANSFORMIST IDEAS
FOR THE SECOND VOLUME OF LYELL'S PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY
RECENTLY there has been considerable revaluation of the development of natural
sciences in the early nineteenth century, dealing among other things with the
works and ideas of Charles Lyell. The task of interpreting Lyell in balanced
terms is extremely complex because his activities covered many fields of
research, and because his views have been unwarrantably distorted in order to
make him the precursor of various modern scientific positions. Martin Rudwick in
particular has contributed several papers relating to Lyell's Principles of
geology, and has repeatedly stressed the need for a comprehensive evaluation of
Lyell's scientific proposals, and of his position in the culture of his time
(1). In the present paper I hope to contribute to the reassessment of Lyell's
work by concentrating on his discussion of transformism, which constituted the
central theme of the second volume of the Principles of geology : the very
length of Lyell's detailed and critical analysis of Lamarck's theories reveals
the importance he attributed to the question of transformism in the contemporary
natural sciences (2).
Several authors have analyzed major aspects of Lyell's work in relation to
contemporary debates in the biological and geological sciences, but no one has
yet paid sufficient attention to the question of Lamarckism, or to theories and
attitudes sympathetic to Lamarck's ideas in the 1820s and early 1830s, or to
Lyell's awareness of the renewed circulation of transformist ideas. Furthermore,
a careful if not exhaustive inquiry into the French biological thought of these
years reveals that the ‘Âge de Cuvier’ was more complex than historians of
science have tended to admit.
In the preface to the third volume of the Principles, Lyell informed the reader
that after the publication of the first volume, in January 1830, he applied
himself ‘to perfect what I had written on the Changes in the organic world - a
subject which merely occupied four or five chapters in my original sketch, but
which was now expanded into a small treatise’(3). Between the initial plan - to
write four or five chapters on the changes in the organic world - and the final
result of his work on this subject - the first eleven chapters of the second
volume - Lyell made two long geological expeditions to the continent. The first
journey lasted from May 1828 to the beginning of March 1829 ; the second
occupied the summer of 1830 (4).
(1) For recent works on Charles Lyell see : M. J. Bartholomew, ‘Lyell and
evolution : an account of Lyell's response to the prospect of an evolutionary
ancestry for man’, The British journal for the history of science, 1973, 6,
261-303 ; ‘Lyell Centenary issue’ of The British journal for the history of
science, 1976, 9, and to particular R. Porter, ‘Charles Lyell and the principles
of the history of geology’, pp. 91-103, and M. J. S. Rudwick, ‘Charles Lyell
speaks in the lecture theatre’, pp. 147-55. Amongst other recent publications by
Professor Rudwick see : ‘Poulett Scrope on the volcanoes of Auvergne. Lyellian
time and political economy’, ibid., 1974, 8, 205-42 ; ‘Charles Lyell, FRS
(1797-1875), and his London lectures on geology’, Notes and records of the Royal
Society of London, 1975, 29, 231-63.
(2) M. J. S. Rudwick ‘The strategy of Lyell's Principles of geology’, Isis,
1970, 61, 4-33. For discussions of the French natural sciences in the early
nineteenth century, see the works cited in notes 4, 49, 59 below.
(3) Charles Lyell, Principles of geology, 3 vols., London, 1830-33, iii, XIV.
Hereafter cited as Principles.
(4) On Lyell's journeys to Italy and France, see L. G. Wilson Charles Lyell. The
years to 1841, the revolution in geology, New Haven, 1972, passim ; and ‘The
intellectual background to Charles Lyell's Principles of geology, 1830-1833’, in
Cecil J. Schneer, ed., Towards a history of geology, Cambridge, Mass., 1969,
426-33.
|